
I am sick and tired of all the pundits giving the quarterback credit for Super Bowl wins. Yes, the quarterback is the field general for the team and, in a lot of cases, winning a Super Bowl has a lot to do with whether the quarterback plays well or does not. But, there are twenty-one other starters that take the field that have a lot to do with the outcome. Football is the ultimate TEAM sport. It is the only sport where players are not asked to play both offense and defense. Baseball, basketball and hockey all require players to stay on the field, court or rink when either team has the ball or puck. Also, we still have not mentioned the coaches, especially the head coach, who is usually the straw that stirs the drink. I know John Wooden always said you can not win championships without great players, but I say more often than not, great players can not win championships without a great head coach.
This phenomenon is predicated on the media’s wish to idolize certain players because most of the media are non-athlete types who only dreamed of playing on the big stage but were never able to. The media really has a biased agenda and is often not equitable in its adjudication of who is great and who is not. I can cite the inequities of Hall of Fame voting, Heisman Trophy voting, college football polls, etc. Why did it take Jim Rice 15 years to get elected to the Baseball Hall of Fame when his numbers were comparable to other Hall of Fame players? Media bias!
Media Bias leads me back to my argument on quarterbacks who play in the Super Bowl. I cite Joe Montana, Troy Aikman, Terry Bradshaw and Tom Brady who all won at least 3 Super Bowls. Don’t get me wrong – each of these guys are great quarterbacks and should be given a lot of credit for their accomplishments on the grandest stage of them all, but they only reached their idol status because the media built them up bigger than they really are. While Montana, Aikman, Bradshaw and Brady are all great, their career numbers are dwarfed by the likes of Dan Marino, Warren Moon and Fran Tarkington, all of whom never won a Super Bowl. Yes, they are all in the Hall of Fame, but why are they not considered as great as the others? Do we only look at how one performs on the big stage? Why is one’s whole body of work not given equal consideration by the media? These SB quarterbacks were surrounded by Hall of Fame players and most notable, incredible head coaches who made it all possible. I say it was more the head coach and a function of the head coach’s philosophy of running the football and playing defense than it was the quarterback himself.
John Elway is now revered as a top five all time quarterback. Do we remember that Elway lost the Super Bowl three times before Mike Shanahan and Terrell Davis came to town? Peyton Manning did win a Super Bowl but he never even made it there until the Colts decided to bring their defense and hand the ball off to their two headed rushing monster of Addai and Rhodes who rushed for a combined 190 yards. Tom Brady never won a Super Bowl when he was the focal point of the offense. After being named league MVP and orchestrating the most prolific offensive season ever seen in the NFL, the Patriots were dumped by the Giants in the Super Bowl. By the way, The Giants played great defense and ran the football.
Just think about what you are saying the next time you anoint Joe Montana the greatest quarterback of all time. Give the whole body of work just as much consideration as you do the performance on the big stage.