Posts Tagged ‘Oklahoma Sooners’

What Is The Big 12 Missing? Nebraska and Texas A&M

Sunday, May 17th, 2009

nebraska-cornhuskersIn 2008, the Big 12 scored points and put quarterbacks in New York for the Heisman Trophy Ceremony.  With obscene offensive numbers, the media jumped on the bandwagon as the Big 12 barked at the heels of the SEC as the dominant conference in college football.  How can the Big 12 shake its reputation as the second-most dominant conference?  The answer lies in two places: College Station, TX and Lincoln, NE.  The Big 12 needs Black Shirts and a Wrecking Crew.  The Big 12 needs Nebraska and Texas A&M to be good again. 

Certainly, OU and Texas can play with Florida and Alabama, but the Gators and the Crimson Tide are just a little better.   Texas Tech and Missouri can play with LSU and Georgia, but the Bayou Bengals and the ‘Dawgs are a lot better. Year-in, year-out, from top to bottom, the SEC has more depth than any other conference, and it looks like that will continue in 2009.

The past few years the Big 12’s second tier has been Texas Tech, Missouri and Kansas.  While this is great for the Red Raiders, Tigers and Jayhawks, the Big 12 as a whole isn’t really getting any better.  It doesn’t need anymore second-tier teams.  It would be an added bonus for the second tier to maintain their success, but the conference needs two more top-tier teams.

Unlike the second tier, the Aggies and Huskers have the resources, facilities, tradition and fan support to get there.  In other words, Tech, Mizzou and KU are all tapped out; they’ve reached their maximum upside.  We all know what Nebraska can be, and Texas A&M has an upside capable of competing with OU and Texas.

OU, Texas, Texas A&M and Nebraska should be mainstays in the Top 10-15, year in, year out.  Right now, only OU and Texas are carrying their weight.  It’s time for the Huskers and Aggies to pull theirs and help carry the Big 12 torch.  

Relative to the SEC, the current state of affairs in the Big 12 is not good:  it’s OU, Texas, and the rest.  On the other hand, the SEC has Florida, Alabama, LSU and Georgia–all teams worthy of serious national consideration.  And Tennessee will be back soon if Lane Kiffin can adjust to the cut-throat recruiting culture of the SEC.

Both Nebraska and A&M made mistakes with their previous coaching hires with Bill Callahan and Dennis Franchione but seem to be happy with their current regimes.  It won’t be 2009, but in the next couple of years we’ll see if the former defensive mastermind Bo Pelini and former NFL Head Coach/GM Mike Sherman have recruited and developed well enough to become more than just a blip on the schedules of OU and Texas.  The Big 12 needs it.  Otherwise, no matter how many points they score or how many of its quarterbacks are invited to the Heisman ceremony, the Big 12 will be looking up at the SEC–again.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

  • Share/Bookmark

Where is the Big XIIs head?

Sunday, November 30th, 2008

Today, the Big XII made a mockery of itself when its rules decided that OU will represent the Big XII South in the Championship game.   The reason? A loophole in the Big XII tie-breaker rules.  I believe that OU and Texas are two of the top 4 teams in the country.  I also believe if that game were played again today, that OU would win.  However, that’s not how things work.  The Sooners don’t get a re-do.  They had their chance, and blew it (at least vs. the Longhorns).

The annual Texas/OU game is one of the best rivalries in all of sports.  For those of you that don’t know, the Cotton Bowl in Dallas is almost exactly halfway between Norman, OK and Austin, TX.  Seating is distributed 50/50 among the Sooners and Longhorns fans.  It’s the ultimate contest of determining who has the better team, as neither team has a home field advantage.   This year, Texas won in a thriller, 45-35….  Head to head, neutral field. 

Fast forward to determining the Big XII South representative in the Championship game, and a likely spot in the National Championship game.  We find out now that a loophole in the conference rules say that afore-mentioned ultimate contest just doesn’t matter.  What?  Loophole? (Jim Mora’s ‘Playoffs?’ diatribe comes to mind) Pathetic.  Embarassing.

OU has performed just as well as Texas has this year–with the exception that they LOST to Texas.  Head to head, neutral field.

OU has pounded its opponents into submission this year–with one exception.  They LOST to Texas.  Head to head, neutral field.

Texas had its lone blemish in Lubbock, TX against the Red Raiders, where in spite of the tremendous home field advantage in favor of Tech, the Longhorns played a close game and the outcome was in doubt until the final minute.  OU later annihilated that same Texas Tech team in Norman, enjoying the home field advantage.  Let’s review again– OU LOST to Texas.  Head to head, neutral field.

The Big XII made huge strides this year to the point where so many of our favorite talking heads debate the league as a better conference than the SEC.  It was a sensational year for teams like Missouri, Oklahoma State, Texas Tech all proving that top-to-bottom, the Big XII is at least as good as the SEC’s top-to-bottom. 

In the SEC tie-breaker rules, head-to-head is the determining factor.  In the Big XII, it’s the team with the highest BCS ranking without consideration for head-to-head winners.

One more time: OU LOST TO TEXAS, HEAD TO HEAD, NEUTRAL FIELD!!!

I think I figured out where the Big XII’s head is.  And it’s NOT a Loophole.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

  • Share/Bookmark